[Tagging] tagging single trees
M∡rtin Koppenhoefer
dieterdreist at gmail.com
Sat Sep 11 13:38:18 BST 2010
2010/9/10 NopMap <ekkehart at gmx.de>:
> John F. Eldredge wrote:
>> Perhaps i've miss something but i haven't see a discussion about a bot
> Yes, you missed something. Check the posts from Sept. 7th:
> Tagging ML:
> Anthony-6: "Can't that analysis be expanded to the world, and the trees
> retagged?"
> M∡rtin Koppenhoefer: "can't you do this analysis and add tags to the
> landmark trees?"
> German ML:
> Wolfgang-4: "Aber aus deinen Daten sollte es doch eigentlich möglich sein,
> die einmal so erkannten und damit "geretteten" Bäume per bot mit einem
> entsprechenden Tag zu versehen,"
>
> I did what was asked for.
no, you did clearly the opposite, and didn't announce this before,
which I think is not the right approach, given that this topic seems
highly controversal.
> You can't mark landmarks automatically, but can
> add a hint to those that are likely unremarkable.
> So please keep complaining, I am removing myself from the discussion.
that's quite absurd and can IMHO not be tolerated: we couldn't come to
a solution on the German ML, then this topic was put to tagging-ML,
nobody agreed with you, voting was suggested, then you used a bot to
make pointless edits, and now you say: "keep complaining, but I'm
removing myself"?
cheers,
Martin
More information about the Tagging
mailing list