[Tagging] RFC: more barrier types
Dave F.
davefox at madasafish.com
Mon Sep 20 22:46:55 BST 2010
On 20/09/2010 19:27, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm asking for comments to the "new" barrier types listed here:
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/New_barrier_types
>
> If you miss something, please report here so that we can extend the
> proposal.
Spike/Teeth Barriers
http://www.entryparkingposts.com/
(First picture)
These don't allow travel unless retracted.
There's also the less destructive ones that allow travel in one
direction as they collapse underneath a vehicle.
(Second picture)
...
A definition for a ha-ha wall would be good:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ha-ha
I think they need to be differentiated from a standard wall, not least
because they're virtually invisible when approaching them, especially
from the higher side.
...
Sea wall:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sea_wall
These are barriers to prevent erosion of the land.
...
Groynes are for some reason classified under man_made which IMO is far
to general.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Groynes
barrier=groyne is a much more descriptive tag.
---
I'm not sure about swing gates. I would have thought the default for
gate would be of the swing variety & therefore doesn't need noting?
More information about the Tagging
mailing list