[Tagging] inconsistencies in bridge

[Dave F.]

  On 27/09/2010 13:51, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote:
>
> I agree that this is the same problem. It isn't a good reason to keep
> bridge=abandoned IMHO. You could workaround with railway=abandoned,
> abandoned=tram, but for bridge the wiki states: bridge=<type>  and
> "abandoned" is clearly not part of a typology vocabulary.
Whilst I understand what you're doing; I think you should have come up 
with an alternative & listed it in the wiki before deleting.

Cheers
Dave F.