[Tagging] inconsistencies in bridge

[Lennard]

On 27-9-2010 16:25, Noel David Torres Taño wrote:
> What about abandoned=yes ?

And expect every data consumer to have to parse that in addition to 
whatever bridge=* value you leave on the data. What's not there anymore 
is just that: not there anymore. It doesn't deserve a bridge=* tag.

That's one thing I've never really understood with railway=abandoned 
either. Sure, many of them have been converted into might fine 
cycleways, but that's just what they are now: cycleways.

-- 
Lennard