[Tagging] inconsistencies in bridge

[M∡rtin Koppenhoefer]

2010/9/27 Dave F. <davefox at madasafish.com>:

>> http://www.23hq.com/dieterdreist/photo/6058662

> That's clearly not a bridge & I wouldn't even bother tagging it.


well, it once was a bridge. I wouldn't tag it as bridge either.


> Where as clearly this is even though no traffic passes over it:
> http://www.publow-with-pensford-pc.gov.uk/pub/photogallery/images/album/village_05.gif


might be an aqueduct, so it would be a type of bridge.

cheers,
Martin