[Tagging] inconsistencies in bridge

Dave F. davefox at madasafish.com
Tue Sep 28 02:58:00 BST 2010


  On 28/09/2010 02:41, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 9:35 PM, Dave F.<davefox at madasafish.com>  wrote:
>>   On 28/09/2010 01:41, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
>>> Strawman. We're only talking about former railway alignments.
>> Hmm... not sure you understand the meaning of the straw man argument.
>>
>> -----
>>
>> You're (sic) statement "Because we don't only map what's currently there." proves
>> you (&  I) have moved the discussion on to include all data.
> False dichotomy. There's a big difference between mapping only what's
> current and mapping everything that has ever existed.

Err... Yes?! That's been a part of my point all along - a big increase 
in data clutter!

> Then what database would you move it to?
>
> Either way it's historic information.

These are clearly statements form someone who doesn't have sound 
reasoning & is just arguing for the sake of it.

Goodnight
Dave f.



More information about the Tagging mailing list