[Tagging] inconsistencies in bridge
Dave F.
davefox at madasafish.com
Tue Sep 28 02:58:00 BST 2010
On 28/09/2010 02:41, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 9:35 PM, Dave F.<davefox at madasafish.com> wrote:
>> On 28/09/2010 01:41, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
>>> Strawman. We're only talking about former railway alignments.
>> Hmm... not sure you understand the meaning of the straw man argument.
>>
>> -----
>>
>> You're (sic) statement "Because we don't only map what's currently there." proves
>> you (& I) have moved the discussion on to include all data.
> False dichotomy. There's a big difference between mapping only what's
> current and mapping everything that has ever existed.
Err... Yes?! That's been a part of my point all along - a big increase
in data clutter!
> Then what database would you move it to?
>
> Either way it's historic information.
These are clearly statements form someone who doesn't have sound
reasoning & is just arguing for the sake of it.
Goodnight
Dave f.
More information about the Tagging
mailing list