[Tagging] inconsistencies in bridge

[Peter Wendorff]

  On 28.09.2010 02:48, John Smith wrote:
> On 28 September 2010 10:38, Dave F.<davefox at madasafish.com>  wrote:
>> If historic data was kept within OSM it would become far to cluttered.
> Not if this data was filtered by default, and only shown if requested.
> The present method of showing everything is limiting for a number of
> reasons.
+1
I think, we should start thinking about a new dimension "time" in 
generally. Perhaps this should better be in the API/attributes similar 
to lat/long instead of inside the tagging, because it's more an 
additional coordinate than a property.
Build in the API the default way to show only current data is easy to 
support, too.
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>