[Tagging] shop=wedding_office [Was: New tag value: shop=wedding]

[M∡rtin Koppenhoefer]

2010/9/28 Mike N. <niceman at att.net>:
>> office=wedding_planner sounds fine to me.
>
>  I agree with this.   However, I have also seen a number of local shops
> which sell only wedding supplies (dresses, etc) but offer no wedding
> services.   They could probably be reclassified as shop=clothes however.


yes, probably a specific tag would be suitable: shop=wedding_dresses
or shop=wedding_clothes.
Because nobody who looks for casual clothing would want to find a
specialized wedding shop, and usually who looks for a wedding shop
would want to exclude "normal" clothing stores (or would be able to do
2 searches).

Btw.: the "general rule" to use singular for shop values in English is
valid only for professions (e.g. butcher), right? I see clothes,
beverages, books, electronics, hearing_aids, shoes, sports, toys which
don't correspond to it.