[Tagging] Another sidewalk question

Anthony osm at inbox.org
Sun Aug 28 03:44:26 BST 2011


On Sat, Aug 27, 2011 at 10:25 PM, Josh Doe <josh at joshdoe.com> wrote:
> Yes, crossings that are unmarked should be mapped if they are in fact
> crossings

Having just read a bit about "unmarked crosswalks", and having found
an objective definition (see
http://www.gazettetimes.com/news/opinion/article_d46b9d80-921a-5255-815f-ebdaaa34ef56.html),
I agree.

On Sat, Aug 27, 2011 at 10:25 PM, Josh Doe <josh at joshdoe.com> wrote:
> since there
> are intersecting nodes with the road and links, a router *could* send
> someone along the road, though of course that would be foolish because
> it is somewhat longer and less safe.

I'm pretty sure it'd be illegal, too.  (And sure, a router *could* do
foolish things, but it *shouldn't*.)



More information about the Tagging mailing list