[Tagging] (no subject)

[fly]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Am 06.12.2011 11:36, schrieb Jo:
> 
> 
> 2011/12/6 Vincent Pottier <vpottier at gmail.com <mailto:vpottier at gmail.com>>
> 
>     Le 06/12/2011 10:43, Martin Koppenhoefer a écrit :
> 
>         2011/12/6 Jo<winfixit at gmail.com <mailto:winfixit at gmail.com>>:
> 
>                 I'd use a polygon (amenity=hotel, etc.) for the whole complex, this
>                 can be easily evaluated, (what nobody does so far with site
>                 relations,
>                 AFAIK)
> 
>             I get complaints if I start using polygons that way...
> 
> 
>         what kind of complaints? From the editor? Which tags?
> 
> 
> I created this fuel station:
> 
> http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/1492951
> 
> and got a complaint from a fellow mapper.
> 
> He didn't like this one either:
> 
> http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/1491170
> 
> But maybe I put the tags in the wrong place.
> 
> JOSM complains with a:
> 
>  Style for outer way mismatches
> 
> Probably because it doesn't like buildings to be members of a multipolygon relation.

A relation needs at least at type=* tag (in this case multipolygon)
and the modern way is to put as many tags as possible in the relation instead of
adding them to each member.

Cheers Colliar
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEAREIAAYFAk7gv/sACgkQHJwlxKzMjpZDmQCcCVBDD+mU+mfLAn2b9I314r1Z
ItAAnjD4OakWWEULJpQh0VPM0Ix3tJCU
=HzgZ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----