[Tagging] designated bike lane

[john at jfeldredge.com]

Two feet wide is about what I had estimated by looking at the photograph, which is why I commented that the bicycle might fit into the bike lane, but part of the rider would have to extend over the line into the automobile lane.  Your wheels would be more-or-less atop the lane divider stripe.

-------Original Email-------
Subject :Re: [Tagging] designated bike lane
From  :mailto:osm at inbox.org
Date  :Sun Jan 02 22:41:09 America/Chicago 2011


On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 10:52 PM, Paul Johnson <baloo at ursamundi.org> wrote:
> Not having a sense of depth, I'd guess in the narrow spot it's about 4
> feet wide, which is, believe it or not, the federal minimum width for
> bike lanes (though I wish Ray would hurry up and adopt Oregon's 6 foot
> lanes and make them mandatory to receive highway funding...)

Google's measurement tool gives more like 2 feet.
(http://maps.google.com/maps?ll=28.078571,-82.56522&spn=0.000622,0.000912&t=h&z=20)

On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 10:49 PM, Paul Johnson <baloo at ursamundi.org> wrote:
> I would call the highway department every day until they fix what they
> screwed up.

1-850-617-2000

_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging at openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

-- 
John F. Eldredge -- john at jfeldredge.com
"Reserve your right to think, for even to think wrongly
is better than not to think at all." -- Hypatia of Alexandria