[Tagging] Differences in cycleways

Pieren pieren3 at gmail.com
Sun Jan 9 17:23:09 GMT 2011

On Sun, Jan 9, 2011 at 1:12 PM, Richard Mann <
richard.mann.westoxford at gmail.com> wrote:

> No. As I said earlier in this discussion, even when there are
> highway=cycleway ways, I leave the cycleway=track tag in place on the
> road (and indeed add it if it isn't already there), so that both
> tagging styles are available for data users. It is much easier to
> render the cycle tracks beautifully (unlike ocm, for instance) if the
> cycleway=track tag is used.
It's not "tagging for the renderers" but closed. And you may confuse routing
applications. When I meet such (very seldom) double tagging, I always
clean-up the most undetailled or obsolete version.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20110109/cf558473/attachment.html>

More information about the Tagging mailing list