[Tagging] new key civilization

Daniel Sabo danielsabo at gmail.com
Wed Jan 12 01:35:13 GMT 2011

For clarity, could these be subtags of historic?

That way we can have more descriptive tags without worrying about conflicts with non-historic meanings.

On Jan 11, 2011, at 4:35 PM, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote:

> 2011/1/11 John F. Eldredge <john at jfeldredge.com>:
>> Perhaps one could have separate tags for civilization and era.  After all, many of these civilizations overlapped to some degree, timewise, while being in different parts of the world.  In some cases, the different civilizations traded with each other (for example, the Roman and Chinese civilizations traded with each other, through intermediaries).
> yes, era is not what I am looking for. I used to tag the time
> component (in rare cases) with the key "period", e.g. period=aurelian
> for one of the city walls of Rome:
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aurelian_Wall.
> cheers,
> Martin
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

More information about the Tagging mailing list