[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Emergency Traffic Signals

Nathan Edgars II neroute2 at gmail.com
Fri Jan 21 06:40:21 GMT 2011

On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 1:03 AM, Paul Johnson <baloo at ursamundi.org> wrote:
> On 01/17/2011 01:38 AM, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
>> On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 2:23 AM, Paul Johnson <baloo-PVOPTusIyP/srOwW+9ziJQ at public.gmane.org> wrote:
>>> Tagging single-aspect signals seems excessive overkill, given the
>>> propensity of single aspect signals and their standard usage emphasizing
>>> other traffic control devices (particularly signals that are permanently
>>> flashing yellow).
>> Maybe they don't have overhead blinkers in states that begin with O,
>> but around here there are a couple two- or four-way stops with
>> single-ball signals suspended from wires.
> Maybe they don't have yellow flashing signals in states that don't start
> with O or W, but such signals are extremely common to the point that you
> might as well map Bott's Dots on the pavement surface while you're at it.

What's your point? I'm talking about the overhead type that acts just
like a permanently-blinking traffic signal, not the small lights
mounted above or below warning signs.

More information about the Tagging mailing list