[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - natural=bare_rock

M∡rtin Koppenhoefer dieterdreist at gmail.com
Sat Jan 29 14:36:09 GMT 2011

2011/1/29 M∡rtin Koppenhoefer <dieterdreist at gmail.com>:
> 2011/1/29 John Smith <deltafoxtrot256 at gmail.com>:
>> That definition hasn't been true since use of surface=* was expanded
>> beyond highways
> can you point me to this decision? In my mapping I almost never see
> surface used for something different than highways.  If you look at
> the actual values you can see that they are nearly completely
> highway-values:

also from a data consuming e.g. rendering point of view I see more
disadvantage then advantage to not separate landcover as a feature
from surface as an attribute to highways.


More information about the Tagging mailing list