[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - natural=bare_rock

M∡rtin Koppenhoefer dieterdreist at gmail.com
Sat Jan 29 17:34:30 GMT 2011

2011/1/29 M∡rtin Koppenhoefer <dieterdreist at gmail.com>:
> I could
> also support surface (there might be space for landcover as well).
> Actually surface=sand or bare_rock makes perfectly sense.

even though this creates some problems: if you tag a polygon with
natural=beach, surface=sand, doesn't this imply a the polygon is sand?
The "beach" could often include also bars, restaurants, parking space,
paths and other. surface on a polygon should IMHO imply that this
polygon has this surface. In this optic the landcover-values is more
generalizing while surface shouldn't.


More information about the Tagging mailing list