[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - natural=bare_rock

John Smith deltafoxtrot256 at gmail.com
Sat Jan 29 17:46:35 GMT 2011


On 30 January 2011 03:28, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer <dieterdreist at gmail.com> wrote:
> It is mainly the meaning, surface refers to the surface while
> landcover refers to the general coverage. I agree that sand is a good
> value for surface, but at the same time there could be
> landcover=trees.

Isn't there plenty of other tree options already, why do we need yet
another one?



More information about the Tagging mailing list