[Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - Stamping_point
Zsolt Bertalan
herrbert74 at gmail.com
Fri Jul 15 12:51:30 BST 2011
I moved the proposal to an obsolete status and started a new proposal. I
don't want to change the body of the old proposal, because I think it can
mess things up during voting. I know voting doesn't mean much, but it's
better to have a consensus than not.
Zsolt
Herrbert74
On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 12:57 PM, Pieren <pieren3 at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 11:29 AM, Chris Hill <osm at raggedred.net> wrote:
>
>> There is no real process. The idea of proposing tags so they get voted on
>> is really broken. Tags can (and should) be used without a voting process.
>> Documenting ideas and tags that get uses is a great idea. Discussing how
>> tags might be used is also useful, but the idea that there is a formal
>> process to get a tag approved is wrong.
>>
>>
> It's not mandatory but if you follow the guidelines, your proposal is
> discussed and improved until it is reaching a certain level of consensus and
> documentation. Which is far better than just using some encrypted tags as a
> trial on a few places.
>
> Pieren
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20110715/0f26e9f9/attachment.html>
More information about the Tagging
mailing list