[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Hiking_checkpoint

[Zsolt Bertalan]

OK, hiking_course sounds good to me too.
I understand that route, trail, etc could be applied also, but it sounds as
foreign and misleading to me as applying movement to you. But I am not a
native speaker, so that doesn't mean too much.

I will change the wiki page. Have a look at it, and tell me, what do you
think about it. Also about description:language.

Zsolt
Herrbert74

On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 4:03 AM, Steve Bennett <stevagewp at gmail.com> wrote:

> On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 1:23 AM, Zsolt Bertalan <herrbert74 at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > That's why we can NOT call the THING a route, trail, walk, etc. THIS
> would
> > be confusing.
>
> "trail" gets used in this metaphorical way, and it's not that
> confusing. Here's an example:
> http://www.thebellarinetastetrail.com.au/
>
> That perfectly matches your description of "They consist of
> checkpoints that you can visit anytime, in any order from any
> dircetion."
>
> How about "tourism route"?
>
> Steve
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20110718/0a4899a7/attachment-0001.html>