[Tagging] landuse:illegal and illegal:yes/no

David Fawcett david.fawcett at gmail.com
Tue Mar 8 18:41:48 GMT 2011


I would think that if this was a good idea and it went forward, you
would want to require an additional tag to cite the
law/regulation/ordinance that has been violated.  (and a link to the
online dossier with all of the evidence and data?...)

I think that this tag is not a good idea.

David.

On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 12:02 PM, yvecai <yvecai at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 08. 03. 11 12:00, grin wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> Your valuable input is welcome and would be much appreciated.
>>
>> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/illegal
>>
>> Thanks,
>> [[user:grin]]
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Tagging mailing list
>> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
>> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
> Hmm, I can imagine edit wars by lawyers ...
> Otherwise illegal=yes/no sounds OK, but landuse I'm not sure.
> landuse=landfill + illegal=yes would be sufficient, I guess.
>
> Yves
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>



More information about the Tagging mailing list