[Tagging] [OSM-talk-be] associatedStreet

fly lowflight66 at googlemail.com
Fri Mar 18 16:35:20 GMT 2011

Am 18.03.2011 14:01, schrieb Jo:
> I also tagged a more complicated one:
> http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/1481829/history
> http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/1481828/history
> http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/1481830/history
> http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/1481831/history
> I guess it can't be helped that sev 
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
eral relations are needed?
> Jo

This correct, but I have to admit that I sometimes violate the rule to
use only one way with role=street.

Otherwise I would get around 50 relations for only one street.

No editor does know how to handel the relation if you split the way with
role street.

I only use several associatedSteets in case of different postal_codes
within the street.

cu fly

More information about the Tagging mailing list