[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Sidewalks as separate ways

David Paleino dapal at debian.org
Fri Mar 25 08:54:35 GMT 2011

On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 04:42:37 -0400, Nathan Edgars II wrote:

> On 3/25/2011 4:37 AM, David Paleino wrote:
> > Routing, not rendering. We don't care about rendering, do you?
> We certainly care about rendering. What we perhaps shouldn't care about 
> is how a specific renderer handles tags.
> I personally don't care much about routing. I'm an old-fashioned guy who 
> prefers to look at the map and determine where to turn based on it.

I probably conveyed the wrong message. We care about rendering, but it
shouldn't be a showstopper for, nor an argument against, any tagging scheme.
(and I don't understand why it was used "against" my proposal: they would be
rendered as normal footways, which makes perfectly sense IMHO).

Sorry for not being clearer,

 . ''`.   Debian developer | http://wiki.debian.org/DavidPaleino
 : :'  : Linuxer #334216 --|-- http://www.hanskalabs.net/
 `. `'`  GPG: 1392B174 ----|---- http://deb.li/dapal
   `-   2BAB C625 4E66 E7B8 450A C3E1 E6AA 9017 1392 B174
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20110325/af8bdbdc/attachment.pgp>

More information about the Tagging mailing list