[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Sidewalks as separate ways
David Paleino
dapal at debian.org
Fri Mar 25 08:54:35 GMT 2011
On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 04:42:37 -0400, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
> On 3/25/2011 4:37 AM, David Paleino wrote:
> > Routing, not rendering. We don't care about rendering, do you?
>
> We certainly care about rendering. What we perhaps shouldn't care about
> is how a specific renderer handles tags.
>
> I personally don't care much about routing. I'm an old-fashioned guy who
> prefers to look at the map and determine where to turn based on it.
I probably conveyed the wrong message. We care about rendering, but it
shouldn't be a showstopper for, nor an argument against, any tagging scheme.
(and I don't understand why it was used "against" my proposal: they would be
rendered as normal footways, which makes perfectly sense IMHO).
Sorry for not being clearer,
David
--
. ''`. Debian developer | http://wiki.debian.org/DavidPaleino
: :' : Linuxer #334216 --|-- http://www.hanskalabs.net/
`. `'` GPG: 1392B174 ----|---- http://deb.li/dapal
`- 2BAB C625 4E66 E7B8 450A C3E1 E6AA 9017 1392 B174
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20110325/af8bdbdc/attachment.pgp>
More information about the Tagging
mailing list