[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Sidewalks as separate ways

Josh Doe josh at joshdoe.com
Fri Mar 25 12:24:42 GMT 2011

I've made some significant edits to the proposal, to try and clarify
some things and boil the proposal down to the basics.

I removed a significant portion of David's text, however I think much
of it is valuable, and so would encourage him to pull it out from the
prior revision and put it on the talk page.


On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 8:18 AM, Richard Fairhurst <richard at systemed.net> wrote:
> David Paleino wrote:
>> Why, oh why, this seems so out-of-context to me?
>> I think I already gave a solution: if you want to do it simple, use
>> sidewalk=*.
>> If you want to add more details, follow my proposal.
> I'm not remotely interested in the merits or otherwise of your proposal. I
> don't have the time to watch every single thing that goes through this list
> and assess whether I need to patch Potlatch 2 to have an inviting UI to
> support it.
> What I am saying is: you can't just say, as you did, "it's not up to me to
> consider how this will be implemented in Potlatch" (or, indeed, any other
> editor). It is _absolutely_ up to you. You're the one who wants the proposal
> to be adopted.
> Richard
> --
> View this message in context: http://gis.638310.n2.nabble.com/Feature-Proposal-RFC-Sidewalks-as-separate-ways-tp6205524p6207468.html
> Sent from the Tagging mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

More information about the Tagging mailing list