[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Sidewalks as separate ways

[Josh Doe]

I've made some significant edits to the proposal, to try and clarify
some things and boil the proposal down to the basics.

I removed a significant portion of David's text, however I think much
of it is valuable, and so would encourage him to pull it out from the
prior revision and put it on the talk page.

-Josh

On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 8:18 AM, Richard Fairhurst <richard at systemed.net> wrote:
> David Paleino wrote:
>> Why, oh why, this seems so out-of-context to me?
>> I think I already gave a solution: if you want to do it simple, use
>> sidewalk=*.
>> If you want to add more details, follow my proposal.
>
> I'm not remotely interested in the merits or otherwise of your proposal. I
> don't have the time to watch every single thing that goes through this list
> and assess whether I need to patch Potlatch 2 to have an inviting UI to
> support it.
>
> What I am saying is: you can't just say, as you did, "it's not up to me to
> consider how this will be implemented in Potlatch" (or, indeed, any other
> editor). It is _absolutely_ up to you. You're the one who wants the proposal
> to be adopted.
>
> Richard
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://gis.638310.n2.nabble.com/Feature-Proposal-RFC-Sidewalks-as-separate-ways-tp6205524p6207468.html
> Sent from the Tagging mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>