[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - area:highway
flaimo at gmail.com
Wed May 11 15:47:16 BST 2011
you misread that. because if its imprecise definition, there are still
heated discussions on how detailed landuses should be mapped. some
leave out the areas of the streets, some don't. all i wanted to state
out is, that this isn't a part of the area:highway proposal. if you
want to draw it over landuses you can do so, but if you are part of
the other fraction you can connect it to landuses. I'm not taking
sides with this proposal.
> Message: 7
> Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 13:58:45 +0200
> From: M?rtin Koppenhoefer <dieterdreist at gmail.com>
> To: "Tag discussion, strategy and related tools"
> <tagging at openstreetmap.org>
> Subject: Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - area:highway
> Message-ID: <BANLkTinvTUt=MFRJeARK75q+H5qwmr04xA at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
> 2011/5/11 Nathan Edgars II <neroute2 at gmail.com>:
>> The proposal makes reference to landuse, in particular stating that one
>> might cut off adjacent landuses at its border. But the two positions on
>> landuse are that it shouldn't be cut or that it should be cut at the
>> right-of-way line, not at the edge of the roadway.
> +1, you're right
> I overlooked this.
More information about the Tagging