[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - addr keys (2011-04)

Flaimo flaimo at gmail.com
Tue May 17 12:10:02 BST 2011

something like that should be handled in a seperate proposal, though i
think most of your examples are covered with addr:housename.


> Message: 1
> Date: Mon, 16 May 2011 13:36:39 +0200
> From: M?rtin Koppenhoefer <dieterdreist at gmail.com>
> To: "Tag discussion, strategy and related tools"
>        <tagging at openstreetmap.org>
> Subject: Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - addr keys (2011-04)
> Message-ID: <BANLkTimL-_p8AYomvpgG26jJyDfmCookYQ at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
> Yes. You are currently concentrating on the micro level, but there
> could be a suggestion for the intermediate scale between the whole
> complex and the micro level as well: de:"Hof" (engl. "courtyard")
> This is often also expressed indirectly in addresses with the German
> terms "Seitenfl?gel" (side wing), "Vorderhaus" (front building),
> "Hinterhaus" (rear building), "2. Hinterhaus" (second rear building =
> 2nd courtyard rear building), etc.)

More information about the Tagging mailing list