[Tagging] Feature proposal - RFC - natural=ridge

John F. Eldredge john at jfeldredge.com
Tue Nov 8 19:03:08 GMT 2011

Nathan Edgars II <neroute2 at gmail.com> wrote:

> On 11/7/2011 5:41 PM, Dmitri Lebedev wrote:
> >> Is a ridge something that can be auto-generated from good
> >> elevationdata? If so, probably only named ridges need to be mapped.
> >
> > I think it's ok to map unnamed ridges, just to show that some
> borders go
> > by them. Also, on a flat map without elevation lines, but with
> > semi-transparent overlay imitating shadows, peaks connected together
> > will make more sense. Right now, look at any mountaineous region,
> the
> > peaks just stick out chaotically. I think it's worth connecting them
> > together.
> >
> What I mean is that if the ridges can be auto-generated, they can be 
> rendered without being in the database.

What data source are you suggesting that the renderer should use, if not the OSM database?
John F. Eldredge -- john at jfeldredge.com
"Reserve your right to think, for even to think wrongly is better than not to think at all." -- Hypatia of Alexandria

More information about the Tagging mailing list