[Tagging] RFC: highway=tidal_road

Paul Johnson baloo at ursamundi.org
Thu Nov 24 18:15:00 GMT 2011

On Wed, 2011-11-23 at 16:43 +0100, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
> 2011/11/23 John F. Eldredge <john at jfeldredge.com>:
> > Stephen Hope <slhope at gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > What would the correct highway classification be for an Oregon
> >> beach?
> >> > These fall under the Oregon Department of Transportation's
> >> jurisdiction
> >> > despite not being improved for vehicular use (and trying will
> >> seriously
> >> > screw up a bicycle, based on experience).
> > It sounds like the beach might be classed as a track, in that case.
> -1, we should not classify every area where vehicles might access as a
> way. You can (physically) drive on most meadows and crops, but that
> doesn't make them a track. He explicitly stated: "despite not being
> improved for vehicular use"

Well, if we're going to exclude ways from being ways because they're not
improved for vehicular use, then i have a lot of cattle trails I need to
remove (despite being named, with addresses along them, open to vehicles
and accessible by 4x4).

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20111124/43f7fa87/attachment.pgp>

More information about the Tagging mailing list