[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - bike safety

Paul Johnson baloo at ursamundi.org
Sun Oct 2 01:36:32 BST 2011

On Sat, 2011-10-01 at 19:48 -0400, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
> On 10/1/2011 6:19 PM, Paul Johnson wrote:
> > So much so that the anal-retentive opposition to such tagging is
> > creating problems for mapping areas that explicitly assign such ratings
> > officially!
> Assuming you're talking about some variant of the "bicycle level of 
> service", why would that belong on the map? We don't have tags for car 
> level of service.

Sure we do.  highway=trunk, highway=motorway, highway=primary...these
tend to be primarily if not exclusively motorist-oriented in practice.

More information about the Tagging mailing list