[Tagging] lanes tag dispute
osm at inbox.org
Sun Sep 18 17:54:19 BST 2011
On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 12:01 PM, Dave F. <davefox at madasafish.com> wrote:
> On 18/09/2011 16:20, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
>> Here's an example of what tagging every lane would lead to:
> I see nothing intrinsically wrong with that. Lots of splitting ways &
> tagging admittedly, but that's a problem with OSM & its tagging process.
I agree. This data would be quite useful to routing software,
especially when combined with information about which lanes have which
Yes, it's a lot of work, and people routinely ignore it, but that
doesn't make it wrong. The way I see it, ignoring short lane number
changes is equivalent to ignoring short traffic dividers (e.g.
http://g.co/maps/cqdmf). I wouldn't blame someone for ignoring it,
but I wouldn't blame someone for including it either.
Nathan, what is one supposed to do if *all* lanes are turning lanes
(e.g. http://g.co/maps/4j2uh)? Do we tag it lanes=0?
More information about the Tagging