[Tagging] lanes tag dispute

Anthony osm at inbox.org
Sun Sep 18 18:27:07 BST 2011


On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 1:17 PM, Nathan Edgars II <neroute2 at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 9/18/2011 1:12 PM, Anthony wrote:
>>
>> On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 12:59 PM, Nathan Edgars II<neroute2 at gmail.com>
>>  wrote:
>>>
>>> I would use lanes=2 there, since that's how many through lanes there are
>>> before the turn lanes begin.
>>
>> And you think any other number of lanes would be *wrong*?
>
> No. What I don't agree with is that lanes=2 is "missing data" or an "interim
> solution". It is simply another way of tagging.

I couldn't disagree with that sentiment more.  Tagging the right
number of lanes is clearly better than tagging the number of lanes
that there used to be.



More information about the Tagging mailing list