[Tagging] lanes tag dispute
osm at inbox.org
Sun Sep 18 18:27:07 BST 2011
On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 1:17 PM, Nathan Edgars II <neroute2 at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 9/18/2011 1:12 PM, Anthony wrote:
>> On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 12:59 PM, Nathan Edgars II<neroute2 at gmail.com>
>>> I would use lanes=2 there, since that's how many through lanes there are
>>> before the turn lanes begin.
>> And you think any other number of lanes would be *wrong*?
> No. What I don't agree with is that lanes=2 is "missing data" or an "interim
> solution". It is simply another way of tagging.
I couldn't disagree with that sentiment more. Tagging the right
number of lanes is clearly better than tagging the number of lanes
that there used to be.
More information about the Tagging