[Tagging] Advice & clarification of the railway tracks=* tag required.
pieren3 at gmail.com
Tue Aug 14 12:47:13 BST 2012
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 1:03 PM, David ``Smith'' <vidthekid at gmail.com> wrote:
> A little bit of redundancy is fine if it makes the data significantly easier
> to use, IMO.
Excepted that ITO map is interpreting the tag as it is documented. If
you zoom at the maximum , you will see that the renderer is drawing
4 parallel lines in colour "red" which means 4 times "4,5 or 6
tracks". It is not redundancy, it's simply wrong.
How can you distinguish when "tracks" is used as it is documented or
when it's used as RM interprets it ?
More information about the Tagging