[Tagging] Advice & clarification of the railway tracks=* tag required.

Pieren pieren3 at gmail.com
Tue Aug 14 12:47:13 BST 2012


On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 1:03 PM, David ``Smith'' <vidthekid at gmail.com> wrote:

> A little bit of redundancy is fine if it makes the data significantly easier
> to use, IMO.

Excepted that ITO map is interpreting the tag as it is documented. If
you zoom at the maximum [1], you will see that the renderer is drawing
4 parallel lines in colour "red" which means 4 times "4,5 or 6
tracks".  It is not redundancy, it's simply wrong.
How can you distinguish when "tracks" is used as it is documented or
when it's used as RM interprets it ?

Pieren

[1] http://www.itoworld.com/map/14#lat=52.796807131849235&lon=-2.0713990318144995&zoom=18



More information about the Tagging mailing list