[Tagging] Carriageway divider
phil at trigpoint.me.uk
Sun Aug 19 14:26:11 BST 2012
On Sun, 2012-08-19 at 15:04 +0200, Tobias Knerr wrote:
> On 19.08.2012 14:09, Markus Lindholm wrote:
> > On 19 August 2012 11:44, Fabrizio Carrai <fabrizio.carrai at gmail.com> wrote:
> >> Indeed a "Divider=solid_line" proposal  was already presented . I'm would
> >> revamp such proposal.
> >> What is your opinion ? Is there any router developer here ?
> > In my opinion it's best to treat legal separation (i.e. solid_line)
> > the same way as physical separation, i.e. create two separate
> > highways, one in each direction.
> This would make it impossible to treat solid lines and physical
> separation differently in rendering, so imo it is not an acceptable
It would also not allow for conditions where the solid line only affects
traffic in one direction.
Also would imply a dual carriageway and therefore imply a higher speed
limit where the National Speed Limit tag has been used.
Routers would still have the ascendancy to route U-turns around the end
of the division.
Really not a solution, the only solution is to add the necessary turn
More information about the Tagging