[Tagging] Fwd: Door to door routing to buildings with multiple occupants
chaoschaos0909 at googlemail.com
Sun Dec 2 01:12:17 GMT 2012
We already had this discussion some time ago. There wasn't a complete
consensus on the matter, but here is how I tag now:
One amenity per building: the addr: tags and the amenity tags on the
building outline. One or multiple entrance nodes on the outline.
Several amenities per building, but each with it's own entry: addr: on the
building outline, multiple entrance nodes on the outline, amenity tags on
the entrance nodes.
Several amenities per building with more than one amenity per door: addr:*
on the building outline, several entrance nodes along the outline, amenity
tags on extra nodes near the entrances inside the building outline.
Several addresses per building: addr:* tags on entrance nodes along the
Some also prefer to put amenities and building into a site relation.
Pros: scales the solution with the complexity of the problem.
Cons: not very consistent, renders poorly
Am 30.11.2012 23:42 schrieb "Rob Nickerson" <rob.j.nickerson at gmail.com>:
> ---------- Forwarding message from talk as more appropriate to tagging
> list ----------
> A mapper who is new to my area is interested in mapping disabled access at
> a micro level. Specifically he would like to achieve door-to-door mapping
> for key shops and amenities, and has made a good start by adding entrance
> doors to several buildings.
> My Question:
> Where should amenity=* and addr:*=* be tagged? One suggestion was to add
> all the detail to the entrance node, but this seems odd to me. For single
> occupancy buildings I suggested tagging the building as amenity=*, etc as
> the entrance node on the building can be easily matched with these.
> But what about a building with multiple occupants and entrances. For
> example 2 shops in one building. One option is to tag the building with
> building=yes and then add the amenity tags to individual nodes, but then
> how would door to door routing work? An alternative is to just split the
> building in to 2 areas (but technically its 1 building). Can we use some
> form of indoor mapping (e.g. room=yes, amenity=*)?
> Is there a better solution? All ideas welcome.
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Tagging