[Tagging] New relation type=provides_feature
markus.lindholm at gmail.com
Fri Dec 7 10:11:35 GMT 2012
On 7 December 2012 10:27, Pieren <pieren3 at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 8:33 AM, Markus Lindholm
> <markus.lindholm at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Created first example of provides_feature
> Your relation type name "provides_feature" is too vague and could be
> used for all relations...
Do you have a alternative suggestion? It's on purpose that I left the
name of the relation a bit vague, so that one could expand it later
with other roles besides the two (address and entrance) that I came
now up with.
> Anyway, most of the mappers will prefer to create 1 node with
> duplicated address instead of creating 3 nodes and your relation.
> Please, think about contributors first. All ideas making data
> consumers life easier but mappers life much more complicated are
Sure, this is not basic level mapping but it builds on existing
objects. And as people do more and more micro-mapping this would be a
suggestion for how to do it.
More information about the Tagging