[Tagging] New relation type=provides_feature

Markus Lindholm markus.lindholm at gmail.com
Sat Dec 15 17:06:38 GMT 2012

On 15 December 2012 11:19, Erik Johansson <erjohan at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 10:48 AM, Markus Lindholm
>> You mean that the role description could be left empty because it
>> could always be deduced from tags on the member? I guess it could be
>> possible, but I think it is much much better to have an explicit role
>> descriptions, foremost for the benefit of the next mapper who comes
>> along and wants to improve and edit the relation. So that he can
>> clearly see what the intention is with the different members.
> The redundancy is what got me wondering what else the role could be
> used for, but I guess there are two parts of that. One is that it
> doesn't really need to be more complex and that it's probably fine if
> I leave the role part out.
> Should I use it on railways stations with subway_entrance and parkings?

Yes, I think it might very well be used to connect a
railway=subway_entrance to a railway=station.

Parking an excellent suggestion for a new role to the relation, I'll
add it to the page.


More information about the Tagging mailing list