[Tagging] Converting relation type "relatedStreet" to "assiciatedStreet"
dapal at debian.org
Sun Feb 19 10:07:12 GMT 2012
On Sun, 19 Feb 2012 10:56:19 +0100, Werner Hoch wrote:
> Hi there,
> the relation type page:
> lists the relatedStreet relation as an similar type of associatedStreet.
> Are there any objection to convert and cleanup the relatedStreets into
> associatedStreet relations?
> Often there could be merge several relatedStreet relations together to
> one associatedStreet relations, as relatedStreets sometime only
> connected single houses to a street.
I'm one of those pushing for type=street, and I'd be glad if we could merge all
somethingStreet to it :) (which is less error-prone, less chars to type, easier
(we should also include type=collection + collection=street and type=route +
route=street -- rationale for the latter is that named routes should be
> Here is my current statistic of street-like relations:
There you can already see that "street" is already at second place just behind
In Italy it's already superior to it :) (1010 vs. 625 )
. ''`. Debian developer | http://wiki.debian.org/DavidPaleino
: :' : Linuxer #334216 --|-- http://www.hanskalabs.net/
`. `'` GPG: 1392B174 ----|---- http://deb.li/dapal
`- 2BAB C625 4E66 E7B8 450A C3E1 E6AA 9017 1392 B174
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the Tagging