[Tagging] unfinished railway of historic importance

[Steve Bennett]

On Feb 26, 2012 3:15 AM, "Russ Nelson" <nelson at crynwr.com> wrote:
>
> It deserves its own tag. Not that I expect renderers to render it
> differently, but it would be nice if they did, and just having a note,
> with variable prose makes it unreasonable to expect them to do it.
>

Seems all up like the right solution it's railway = abandoned combined with
another more specific tag like unfinished = no. This will produce a very
sensible result in any software (not just renderers) that supports railways
at all with no losses of specificity.

Steve
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20120226/8002f05b/attachment.html>