[Tagging] access=no (was Amenity swimming_pool (was Amenity parking))

Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdreist at gmail.com
Mon Jan 16 13:19:43 GMT 2012


2012/1/16  <dies38061 at mypacks.net>:
> There was some mention in this thread of the some lack of utility of "access=no" as a tag-value pair as someone usually has access to somewhere, it is just impeded by rules or physical barriers; I do agree with this in general.  If we move to the inclusion of a historical layer, then "access=no" could, in fact, be a default parameter for historical features as they are truly not accessible due to a time barrier.  --ceyockey


What I am missing in this discussion is that access according to the
first sentence in the wiki [1] is used "to describe the _legal_
access", so no, access=no shouldn't be used to mark a "time barrier"
(non-existing features).

cheers,
Martin

[1] http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Access



More information about the Tagging mailing list