[Tagging] Feature proposal: landuse=apiary

Tormi Tabor tormi.tabor at gmail.com
Fri Jul 6 18:39:51 BST 2012


Thanks, gave up proposing landuse. Now we have to choose between man_made
and amenity:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Proposed_features/apiary#Landuse_vs_man_made_vs_amenity


2012/7/6 Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdreist at gmail.com>

> 2012/7/6 Tobias Knerr <osm at tobias-knerr.de>:
> > On 04.07.2012 19:43, Tormi Tabor wrote:
> >> Created a new tag proposal for an apiary, let's discuss about it:
> >> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/apiary
> >
> > landuse is generally intended for relatively large-scale features.
> >
> > That you are listing nodes as an option for mapping this feature (and
> > not just as a temporary solution, but as a suggested tagging style) is a
> > clear sign that landuse is not a good key choice. landuse tags tend to
> > be associated with areas almost exclusively.
> >
> > So I'd prefer if you could come up with a different key for the feature.
>
> +1
> I'd use amenity from the rarely used tags you list at the bottom of
> your proposal.
>
> cheers,
> Martin
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20120706/d1cd7a9e/attachment.html>


More information about the Tagging mailing list