[Tagging] access agricultural, WAS Re: Reviving the conditions debate

[Martin Koppenhoefer]

2012/6/15 Flaimo <flaimo at gmail.com>:
>> How can we resolve this? It seems obvious that we need either 2 tags
>> for agricultural (according to the legislation, either a vehicle class
>> or a use case is intended), or we accept that the same tag has
>> different meanings in different legislations/countries. Personally I
>> am in favour of an additional tag. We could also have 2 new tags:
>> "agricultural_use" and "agricultural_vehicle" to make it unambiguous,
>> and to deprecate the unclear agricultural.
>
> very easy. use the 1.5 proposal :-). for germany you could use
> access:motorized&&agricultural=yes. in developing countries, where
> motor vehicles are not common for most people, you could just use the
> role: access:agricultural=yes


this does not really help resolving the problem of agricultural being
seen as a vehicle class by some mappers and as a use mode by others.

cheers,
Martin