[Tagging] Money transfer agents

Pieren pieren3 at gmail.com
Tue Nov 20 09:47:29 GMT 2012

On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 11:55 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer
<dieterdreist at gmail.com> wrote:

> I think it is pointless to have operator:money_transfer rather than a
> simple "operator". The tag should refer to the object that is tagged,
> and if it is a money transfer it will refer to that, also when you
> don't prefix it. I didn't check if it is western union that operates
> the office, or if it is a kind of franchise in which case it would be
> tagged as "brand=Western Union"

It's related to my question. A bank may offer money transfer from
western union, insurance from an insurance company, sell phone
subscriptions from a third one, etc...


More information about the Tagging mailing list