[Tagging] How to tag: Legally separated ways

Martin Vonwald imagic.osm at gmail.com
Mon Oct 15 09:27:26 GMT 2012


2012/10/15 Colin Smale <colin.smale at xs4all.nl>:
> I am not sure I would interpret the diagram in that way though; the fact
> that there are no arrows on the road from part 5 onwards suggests to me that
> there is no chance of changing your mind.

There is no chance of (legally) changing your mind, because there are
double solid lines ;-)


> I think the intention is that part
> 5 is the start of physical separation, but I might be wrong here.

Sorry, you are wrong - I drew the image ;-) But because the image is
not 100% clear I added a note in the related article and now I have to
make sure the note is correct and clear.

Thanks!
Martin

> Colin
>
>
> On 15/10/2012 10:56, Martin Vonwald wrote:
>>
>> Hi!
>>
>> Some kind of short how-would-you-tag-this-survey. Have a look at part
>> five of this motorway:
>> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Lanes_Example_2.png
>>
>> Only part 5 is relevant. Assume there is no physical separation just a
>> double line between the upper and lower two lanes. How would you tag
>> this:
>> a) One way with lanes=4
>> b) Two separate ways with lanes=2 each
>> c) Tell me!
>>
>> Please also reason your decision.
>>
>> Many thanks in advance,
>> Martin
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Tagging mailing list
>> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
>> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging



More information about the Tagging mailing list