[Tagging] RFC advertising

Peter Wendorff wendorff at uni-paderborn.de
Sun Oct 28 07:39:02 GMT 2012

I would suggest to add a short rationale in the "proposed key" section.

I think, the following arguments were useful (as long as it's carefully 
described not to be requirements):
- these objects often are landmarks (let's meet under the clock, after 
the advertising column turn right...)
- often they are quite prominent

Reading your proposal and the amenity=clock page together, I miss the 
"suggested combination" of both for the common case of public clocks 
surrounded by or mounted together with advertising ... cubes? (compare 
example #1 on the clocks page).
Probably that cubic thing is a candidate for an additional advertising 
value as well? (but I have no idea, what the name could be and if it's 
known enough to count as an own type.


Am 28.10.2012 04:04, schrieb Martin Koppenhoefer:
> Please have a look at the advertising proposal, I am planning to get
> this soon to voting:
>   http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/advertising
> cheers,
> Martin
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

More information about the Tagging mailing list