[Tagging] RFC advertising
Peter Wendorff
wendorff at uni-paderborn.de
Sun Oct 28 07:39:02 GMT 2012
Hi.
I would suggest to add a short rationale in the "proposed key" section.
I think, the following arguments were useful (as long as it's carefully
described not to be requirements):
- these objects often are landmarks (let's meet under the clock, after
the advertising column turn right...)
- often they are quite prominent
Reading your proposal and the amenity=clock page together, I miss the
"suggested combination" of both for the common case of public clocks
surrounded by or mounted together with advertising ... cubes? (compare
example #1 on the clocks page).
Probably that cubic thing is a candidate for an additional advertising
value as well? (but I have no idea, what the name could be and if it's
known enough to count as an own type.
Regards
Peter
Am 28.10.2012 04:04, schrieb Martin Koppenhoefer:
> Please have a look at the advertising proposal, I am planning to get
> this soon to voting:
>
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/advertising
>
> cheers,
> Martin
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
More information about the Tagging
mailing list