[Tagging] Clarify tag access doc
Martin Koppenhöfer
dieterdreist at gmail.com
Tue Sep 11 14:42:23 BST 2012
Am 11/set/2012 um 14:17 schrieb Pieren <pieren3 at gmail.com>:
>
> I'm currently trying to refresh a wiki translation of the Access key page:
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access
> I think too that a signle value is enough as already mentionned there.
> If we keep "customer", we need another one for "employee" (vs
> "custormer" parkings/entrances). Or I may suggest a subtag like
> "access=destination" + "destination=customer/employee".
Employee would be private IMHO, not destination
>
> - "designated" vs "official". If I understand the wiki, the first is
> "not compulsory and often marked by a traffic signal" where the second
> is "complusory and always marked by a traffic signal". Is that correct
> ?
IIRR those were initially intended to mean the same.
> So, for instance, as a router for
> cars, how should I handle a road tagged with "access=official" (or
> "designated") + "bicycle=yes" ?
Strange tagging. Access=designated does not follow the convention <mode of transport>=designated. You cannot infer access restrictions for cars from this (I.e. fall back to the default, which depends on the highway class).
>
> - is "permissive" a legal status, as the introduction says that values
> are all about "legal access" ?
Yes, it is a legal status that says you don't have an official right of way.
Cheers,
Martin
More information about the Tagging
mailing list