[Tagging] access restrictions on ways

[Martin Vonwald]

Hi!

2012/9/17 André Pirard <A_Pirard at hotmail.com>

> **
> But now what does that highway code tell us about C23 after all?
> "accès interdit" = "forbidden access": to where?  To behind the sign, of
> course.
> Unlike C43 speed limit below which is bound to say "up to the next
> crossing" to tell you where you can speed up again, there is no point in
> saying what happens behind C23 sign if the driver cannot go there, is
> there?
>
> But now how can we make a map of such a case if OSM instructions<http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:maxweight>
> make the weight limit a way attribute and JOSM scolds with : *Wrong
> highway tag on a node.  Suspicious tag/value combinations*?  Is that
> Esneux adm playing tricks on OSM? ;-)
>
>   André.
>
>   *C23. **Accès interdit*<http://www.code-de-la-route.be/textes-legaux/sections/ar/code-de-la-route/251-art68>aux conducteurs de véhicules affectés au transport de choses.
> Une inscription sur un panneau additionnel limite l'interdiction aux
> conducteurs de véhicules dont la masse en charge dépasse la masse indiquée.
> 7,5t
>
>
>
>
 My two cents: we should allow such kind of restriction to be placed on a
node, because that's the way they work. They are just some kind of "legal
barrier" and barriers on a road we (usually) map as a node.

Martin
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20120917/3a5c678e/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/png
Size: 1989 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20120917/3a5c678e/attachment-0001.png>