[Tagging] Announcement: Voting ongoing for proposed access tagging "Conditional restrictions"

[Eckhart Wörner]

Hi Rob,

Am Mittwoch, 19. September 2012, 20:10:45 schrieb Rob Nickerson:
> Am Mittwoch, 19. September 2012, 18:08:30 schrieb Rob Nickerson:
> >* Despite some of the perceived benefits of this proposal being challenged*>* (mainly in regards to their relevance),*
> Except for one claimed benefit, I did not question the relevance of
> the claims, but their validity. Maybe you should read mails before
> summarizing them?
> -- End --
> 
> Please accept my apologies that my English was not clear. I did read
> your mails and my wording should be seen as it was intended - that is,
> the perceived benefits may not be "relevant" due to the "invalidity"
> of the thing they are trying to fix. I will try to be more exact next
> time.

I apologize for being a bit harsh on my response. My intention was not to be picky about the language, just to note that there is an important distinction. "Invalidity" is something that can normally verified/falsified, "relevance" lies in the eye of the viewer.

Eckhart