[Tagging] [OSM-talk] Crossroad names

Satoshi IIDA nyampire at gmail.com
Tue Apr 2 16:54:38 UTC 2013


Why don't use our old "relation = tarffic_lights"? (or junction?)
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relations/Proposed/Traffic_Lights
(yes, it need more advanced!)

I would like to against write them as area.

Relation feature essentially means, "group up some objects to represent as
a feature".
So I think it could suite for our traffic_signal & junction naming, routing.
(relation could express "label" membership)




2013/3/29 Pieren <pieren3 at gmail.com>

> On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 2:22 PM, Janko Mihelić <janjko at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > I saw this proposal before and I liked it. Now I like it even more
> because
> > it solves the junction name problem.
>
> As area, only used 3 times by 2 different users in one year (date of
> the proposal):
>
> 2 by the proposal writer "imagic":
> http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/210448306
> http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/202280167
>
> 1 by "Soldier Boy":
> http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/190569949
>
> Another one is a mistake (roundabout):
> http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/43114115
>
> Not something I would call "a success".
>
> But 1132 relations of type "junction":
> http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/type=junction
> http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/relations/junction#overview
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relations/Proposed/Junctions
>
> Pieren
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>



-- 
Satoshi IIDA
mail: nyampire at gmail.com
twitter: @nyampire
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20130403/c777050c/attachment.html>


More information about the Tagging mailing list