[Tagging] Life cycle group
on-osm at xs4all.nl
Mon Apr 8 17:42:57 UTC 2013
On 08/04/2013 09:07, Alberto wrote:
> Well, disused:*=* and abandoned:*=* are widely used, you could simply link
> to their Wiki pages.
> For construction, we should make a general proposal separated from power
> refinements, as you suggest.
We really need a consistent life cycle scheme that defines all stages of
an objects life, that is proposed, construction, (active), disused,
abandoned and historic (completely gone). The <life cycle state>:<key>=*
scheme is my favourite. Somebody just needs to make a proposal (it would
basically be a generalisation of the disused:*=* tag).
for a comparison of current ways of tagging life cycles.
Ole / polderrunner
More information about the Tagging