[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - More Consistency in Railway Tagging

Rovastar rovastar at hotmail.com
Sat Apr 13 11:54:08 UTC 2013

I too think that tracks should just be a single lane. From the reasons stated
above put more by Kytömaa Lauri more eloquently than I will. If a road has a
physical split it is 2 separate one way streets. Tracks are physically
separate so they should be mapped as such.

Roads and the crossings of multiple tracks are a little tricky but maybe
this can be done as a relation rather than a node. I am no expert on tagging
railway crossings.

As San Fran doesn't look like it has many railways I suggest you look at
locations around the world maybe UK that has a detailed rail infrastructure
so you get a better understanding about how it is done there.

Most of your issues seem to be about the rendering of the map rather than
the map data.

View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Feature-Proposal-RFC-More-Consistency-in-Railway-Tagging-tp5756879p5756913.html
Sent from the Tagging mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

More information about the Tagging mailing list