[Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - Bicycle=use_cycleway

Paul Johnson baloo at ursamundi.org
Sun Dec 1 07:03:07 UTC 2013


If that's the case, then "bicycle:(forward|backward)=no" would also be
broken, which I'm not seeing in the proposal.  As Mele can vouch for, I'm
probably OSM's strongest bicycling advocate, and I can't see a strong use
for adding another tag to a key on this one.


On Sat, Nov 30, 2013 at 6:37 PM, Jonathan <bigfatfrog67 at gmail.com> wrote:

> You mean the cycle lane is only oneway and so bicycle=no on the road stops
> bikes both way?
>
> http://bigfatfrog67.me
>
>
> On 01/12/2013 00:15, Martin Koppenhöfer wrote:
>
>>
>> Am 30.11.2013 um 21:25 schrieb Matthijs Melissen <
>> info at matthijsmelissen.nl>:
>>
>>  Cyclists shall be required to use the track if the track is running
>>> along a
>>> carriageway, footpath or track for riders on horseback and leading into
>>> the
>>> same direction
>>>
>>
>> Again a confirmation ("and leading into the same direction") that
>> bicycle=no on the road doesn't work (like many opposers stated in the
>> voting)
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Martin
>> _______________________________________________
>> Tagging mailing list
>> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20131201/1dc76424/attachment.html>


More information about the Tagging mailing list